Brisbane jury fails to achieve a verdict in case of homosexual guy ac…


The jury has been discharged within the trial of an brazenly homosexual guy accused of raping his feminine buddy once they had been not able to achieve a majority verdict. 

The team of 7 males and 5 girls deliberated for 10 hours within the Brisbane District Court on whether or not Dominic Edmund Hansson, 28, is in charge of 1 depend of rape on December 7, 2019.

Police allege Hansson – who has been labelled a ‘narcissist’ – arrived on the lady’s inside town rental with out invitation about 1.30am at the morning in query, inebriated and decided to spend the night time. 

The complainant was once asleep however allowed Hansson to sleep at the sofa, sooner than he satisfied her to let him in mattress through reminding her he was once homosexual and in a dedicated, four-year dating. 

It’s alleged Hansson started ‘spooning’ the girl about 2.30am sooner than ‘flipping her onto her abdomen’ and raping her. 

Both the prosecution and defence made sturdy remaining submissions, with Hansson’s criminal workforce arguing there was once ‘no means’ for the jury to deem the complainant a reputable and dependable witness.

The jury indicated on Thursday they wouldn’t be capable to achieve a verdict however had been recommended to take a look at to decide. About 11.45am on Friday, it was once transparent that will be inconceivable.

The subject will now go back to courtroom on July 14 the place it’ll be decided if Hansson will face a retrial.  

The prosecution argues Hansson ‘took what he already knew about her intercourse existence as an entitlement to regard her like an object’, conserving her face down on her mattress and telling her he knew ‘she favored it tough’ when she pleaded with him to forestall.

He sat stony-faced, supported through his father, as his criminal workforce argued the intercourse was once consensual and his alleged sufferer had a ‘vendetta’ that induced her to press fees.

The team of 7 males and 5 girls deliberated for 10 hours within the Brisbane District Court on whether or not Dominic Edmund Hansson, 28, is in charge of 1 depend of rape on December 7, 201 

The matter will now return to court on July 14 where it will be determined if Hansson will face a retrial

 The subject will now go back to courtroom on July 14 the place it’ll be decided if Hansson will face a retrial

 The defence

Hansson’s barrister Michael Bonasia was hoping to persuade the jury it was once inconceivable to believe the complainant an ‘truthful or dependable witness’.

‘She stated she sought after to discover sexual relationships, she was once manipulative and slept along with her homosexual buddy who was once in a significant dating. This is a lady who stated she will deceive get what she needs,’ he stated in his remaining submissions on Wednesday.

‘This isn’t a rape trial, it’s an ordeal of disgrace and vengeance.’

Throughout his remaining arguments, Mr Bonasia honed in at the meant unreliability of the complainant and the stairs had to to find his shopper in charge.

‘You would possibly come to a decision there may be merely not anything dependable concerning the witness, and also you’ll have to search out him no longer in charge,’ he stated.

‘You may suppose possibly he’s in charge. That there’s a risk. That is sufficient for anyone to be charged, however it isn’t past cheap doubt. If you end up announcing it in all probability took place, you will have to to find him no longer in charge.

‘Even should you to find he almost definitely did it, you’re accountability sure to search out him no longer in charge.’

Mr Bonasia instructed the jury to not be ‘swayed’ through emotive terminology like ‘in poor health’ or ‘narcissist’, including ‘this can be a courtroom of regulation, no longer of morals’.

He additionally referenced ‘issues which might be taking place in parliament and Hollywood’ together with the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial.

‘This isn’t leisure. This isn’t a reputation contest. You can’t come to a decision this situation in response to the truth you don’t like that Dominic cheated on his boyfriend of 4 years. You can’t convict him of rape since you don’t just like the tone of a few messages he despatched… or that he was once attractive in leisure drug use.’

Hansson told her he would take his own life if his long term, live-in partner at the time, Tony Rickards (pictured together), were to ever learn of the indiscretion.  The pair have since split

Hansson advised her he would take his personal existence if his long run, live-in spouse on the time, Tony Rickards (pictured in combination), had been to ever be told of the indiscretion.  The pair have since break up

The explosive messages 

The lady – who can’t be named – went to police and filed a document on April 21, greater than 4 months after the alleged attack.

Hansson’s defence argues she made a false document as a result of she was once insulted that the 28-year-old described her as an escort. They additionally cited a separate altercation between the pair over marijuana.

The incident in query happened hours sooner than the complainant went to police.

In Facebook messages tendered to courtroom, Hansson advised the alleged sufferer: ‘You wish to watch out with the aromas that come from your rental. From what I will be able to inform it’s marijuana; continuously. Please forestall.’

The lady took factor with the message as a result of she claimed he steadily got here to her rental to invite for marijuana.

Brisbane jury fails to achieve a verdict in case of homosexual guy ac...

A heated Facebook alternate between the girl and Hansson (virtual mock up above in response to courtroom listening to) is a part of the rationale she reported the alleged attack to police, the defence argues

She replied: ‘Don’t you dare come into my rental asking for a similar factor you might be complaining about. I let you know I should not have any and you then b**ch concerning the odor of weed within the development?’

Hansson denied he ‘did both of the ones issues’.

The complainant advised police Hansson was once at her rental hours sooner than sending the ones messages however she felt uncomfortable and didn’t give him what he was once inquiring for.

She additionally denied running as an escort, as Hansson had claimed. She expressed an pastime within the BDSM group and confided in Hansson about being a ‘sugar child’ and having an energetic OnlyLovers account.

‘She was once doing this sugar daddy factor,’ the courtroom heard. ‘She was once doing belongings you the jury may not be into, or Hansson mightn’t be into, however that does not imply she does not wish to consent.’ 

Hansson's barrister Michael Bonasia hoped to convince the jury it was impossible to consider the complainant an ‘honest or reliable witness’

Hansson’s barrister Michael Bonasia was hoping to persuade the jury it was once inconceivable to believe the complainant an ‘truthful or dependable witness’

The ‘poisonous narcissist’ 

The jury heard Hansson ‘manipulated’ the sufferer in a ‘poisonous’ try to erode self belief in herself and her recollection of the occasions.

Hansson advised her he would take his personal existence if his long run, live-in spouse on the time, Tony Rickards, had been to ever be told of the indiscretion and allegedly demanded she ship messages mentioning not anything untoward had took place between the pair.

In his remaining argument, Crown prosecutor Chris Cook requested the jury to believe whether or not Hansson is a narcissist.

‘You may conclude he is a narcissist who can communicate his means out of anything else. Only enthusiastic about himself. He lies to his spouse, lied to the sufferer. He engaged in secret messages to the sufferer. He lied to police… He’s a secretive guy.’ 

Hansson’s criminal workforce argued narcissism is a psychiatric dysfunction and that their shopper was once no longer recognized with the sort of situation. 

They stated the word was once used just because it elicits emotion and in an try to sway the jury.

He sat stony-faced, supported by his father and now-ex, as his legal team argued the sex was consensual and his alleged victim had a 'vendetta' that prompted her to press charges

He sat stony-faced, supported through his father and now-ex, as his criminal workforce argued the intercourse was once consensual and his alleged sufferer had a ‘vendetta’ that induced her to press fees

The complainant who ‘loved manipulating males’ 

The complainant’s attorney made a case that she wasn’t a great witness however was once truthful and open when she took the stand previous within the week, bringing up her bravery for coming ahead and enduring two years of court cases. 

Meanwhile the defence has inspired the jury to believe a number of key components within the testimony of the girl and her reliability as a witness.

Psychologist notes dredged up from mid 2018 – 18 months sooner than the alleged offence came about – divulge the sufferer considers herself ‘manipulative’.

In the consultation, the girl admitted she may ‘deceive others to get what she needs’.

But Hansson’s criminal workforce drew consideration to a counselling consultation simply 5 days after the alleged attack during which she reportedly unfolded concerning the morning of December 7, 2019.

In it, the complainant advised her counsellor she was once ‘ashamed’ that she’d ‘had intercourse along with her homosexual buddy’ however ‘loved manipulating males,’ the courtroom heard.

When the idea that of manipulating males was once put to her, the girl stated she was once regarding her paintings as a sugar child.

The defence additionally argues she maintained a friendship with Hansson for 4 months after the alleged rape sooner than contacting police or confiding in her counsellor.

Her criminal workforce claims it is because he manipulated her into doing so, and that she was once scared to return ahead.

Hansson (pictured with his parents) told police in his initial interview 'there was no point while we were having sex where she told me to stop, or indicated that she didn't want sex any more'

Hansson (pictured together with his folks) advised police in his preliminary interview ‘there was once no level whilst we had been having intercourse the place she advised me to forestall, or indicated that she did not need intercourse any longer’

The night time in query 

Hansson advised police in his preliminary interview ‘there was once no level whilst we had been having intercourse the place she advised me to forestall, or indicated that she did not need intercourse any longer’.

‘I stated ‘Do you need to have intercourse?’ and she or he stated ‘Of path I do’,’ he stated within the May 31, 2020, formal interview.

The complainant argued this isn’t how a tender lady would broach the subject of attractive in intercourse.

Hansson alleged the girl initiated flirting at the night time in query and changed into step by step extra ‘sensitive feely’ because the night time went on.

The 28-year-old arrived at her inside town rental about 1.30am after an evening out.

When he arrived, the pair allegedly ate pizza at the sofa. Six-and-a-half hours sooner than he arrived, the complainant ate 1/2 of a weed brownie which she stated didn’t make her prime, however was once efficient sufficient to lend a hand her sleep.

Hansson claims the complainant was once ingesting a cider and that he’d handiest ate up two glasses of champagne previous within the night time.

Bank statements display he spent $143 in overall on the Waterloo Hotel in Fortitude Valley between the night time of December 6 and early December 7.

While Hansson now admits to sexual intercourse, he initially told the complainant to send him a message denying they'd even touched so that he could 'show his boyfriend' nothing had happened

While Hansson now admits to sexual sex, he first of all advised the complainant to ship him a message denying they might even touched in order that he may ‘display his boyfriend’ not anything had took place

While Hansson now admits to sexual sex, he allegedly first of all advised the complainant to ship him a message denying they might even touched in order that he may ‘display his boyfriend’ not anything had took place.

When Mr Rickard, Hansson’s ex, took the stand, he may no longer recall ever inquiring for evidence or seeing the ones messages.

When induced as to why he engaged in intercourse with a lady if he was once homosexual, Hansson stated: ‘Curiosity. I used to be simply curious and having this type of emotional bond we had on the time, it made me a lot more curious, , I used to be questioning whether or not I used to be actually in truth homosexual.’

The complainant thought to be Hansson a excellent buddy up till December 7 and had confided in him about her despair, psychological well being problems and pursuits as a ‘sugar child’.

Hansson maintained his composure because the entirety of the submissions had been recounted to the jury. He had a number of supporters in courtroom who listened carefully and delivered him lunch all the way through the damage.

The complainant considered Hansson a good friend up until December 7 and had confided in him about her depression, mental health issues and interests as a 'sugar baby'

The complainant thought to be Hansson a excellent buddy up till December 7 and had confided in him about her despair, psychological well being problems and pursuits as a ‘sugar child’



Source link

Source link

Leave a Reply