New York City, June 12, 2025 – A brewing controversy has erupted on social media platform X.com, where posts claim that TikTok users are being offered $200 to join the “No Kings Day” protests scheduled for June 14, 2025, in New York City. These protests, organized by groups like the 50501 Movement and Indivisible, target U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and President Donald Trump’s stringent deportation policies. The allegations, amplified by a viral video, suggest that organizers are encouraging “chaotic disruptions” with materials like bricks provided at protest sites, raising fears of potential violence and drawing parallels to past unrest like the 2020 George Floyd protests.
The “No Kings Day” protests, billed as a “nationwide day of defiance,” are set to coincide with a military parade in Washington, D.C., marking the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary and Trump’s 79th birthday. Organizers, including Indivisible’s co-founder Ezra Levin, describe the events as a rejection of authoritarianism, with over 1,800 rallies planned across the U.S., excluding D.C., to avoid direct confrontation with the parade. The protests aim to spotlight Trump’s immigration policies, which include intensified ICE raids and plans for mass deportations, as well as broader concerns about civil rights and government overreach.
A TikToker’s claim, shared widely on X, alleges that organizers offered $200 per day to participants, with instructions to cause disruptions and references to “pallets of bricks” at protest sites. This has sparked outrage and skepticism, with users like @LibertyAngelUSA and @lotusbeebee questioning the authenticity of the movement and suggesting it may be a staged effort to incite chaos. The mention of bricks echoes reports from 2020, when mysterious piles of bricks appeared during protests in cities like Dallas and Kansas City, fueling speculation about premeditated violence.
🚨BREAKING: Another TikToker reveals they were offered $200 to join the nationwide “No Kings Day” protest in NYC—targeting ICE and President Trump’s deportation policies. pic.twitter.com/Ffrzu19GKO
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) June 11, 2025
Trump’s immigration policies, implemented since his second term began on January 20, 2025, have intensified ICE operations, with high-profile raids in cities like New York, Atlanta, and Los Angeles detaining hundreds of undocumented immigrants. A January 23, 2025, DHS memo authorized multiple federal agencies, including the DEA and U.S. Marshals, to assist ICE, escalating enforcement efforts. These actions, coupled with Trump’s plan to use Guantanamo Bay for migrant detention, have galvanized opposition, with protests like those in Los Angeles—where a curfew was imposed after freeway blockades—highlighting the growing unrest.
The financial incentive allegations have raised questions about the integrity of the protests. “Are people genuinely invested in the cause, or are they simply looking for a quick payout?” asked one X user, reflecting a broader debate about the role of social media in mobilizing activism. Critics point to the 2020 protests, where similar claims of paid agitators surfaced, though evidence was often inconclusive. The “No Kings” website emphasizes nonviolent demonstrations, urging participants to avoid weapons and de-escalate conflicts, but the TikTok video’s claims have fueled concerns about hidden agendas.
In New York City, protests are planned across all five boroughs, including Grace Plaza in Manhattan and Grand Army Plaza in Brooklyn, with elected officials and advocates condemning recent ICE arrests at immigration courthouses. The deployment of 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles following clashes there has heightened tensions, with Trump warning that any disruptions to the D.C. parade will be met with “very big force.”
As June 14 approaches, the “No Kings Day” protests highlight the deepening divide over immigration policy and the role of social media in shaping public dissent. While organizers frame the movement as a stand for democracy, the allegations of paid protesters and planned disruptions have cast a shadow, prompting calls for transparency and peaceful action. With millions expected to participate nationwide, the outcome of these protests could shape the narrative around Trump’s policies and the future of grassroots activism in America.
Sources: