The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?

JAMES BALDASSARRE’S LONG-AWAITED CHANCE for payback was once to hand. The 51-year-old sergeant, whom a reporter referred to as the “easiest prototype … of the hard-bitten, sardonic ‘previous Army common,’” had watched Japanese guards torture and homicide his fellow prisoners throughout the Bataan Death March in April 1942, and he had persevered greater than 3 brutal years as a prisoner of conflict, swearing to stick alive to look his captors get what they deserved. 

Now, on Jan. 9, 1946, he was once within the Philippine capital of Manila to testify on the war-crimes trial of Masaharu Homma, the Japanese normal who commanded the warriors who had brutalized hundreds of helpless American and Filipino prisoners throughout the march 4 years previous. There was once for sure the place Baldassarre stood.

“They must cling the person. He is a no-good son of a complain. I must pull the rope …. Send him to me. I’ll repair him up,” he instructed journalists outdoor the court. 

Homma’s protection legal professionals portrayed their consumer as an out-of-touch commander, stored at nighttime in regards to the atrocities his troops have been committing. The prosecutors, on the other hand, believed Homma knew about his males’s barbarity and had selected to forget about it. 

Dozens of survivors have been covered as much as testify towards Homma, so prosecutors would have little bother proving the horrors of the march — however extra was once wanted. The case hinged on a cloudier factor: Could Baldassarre and different witnesses hyperlink Homma to the atrocities of the march through appearing Homma most probably knew what his males have been doing and had grew to become a blind eye to it? The solution may just decide whether or not Homma lived or died.

HOMMA and the Philippines

AT THE START OF THE WAR, Japan focused the Philippine islands, an American ownership since 1898. Tokyo assigned Lt. Gen. Homma and his 14th Army to seize the islands, and anticipated the marketing campaign to take not more than 50 days. Homma’s opponent was once Gen. Douglas MacArthur, who commanded the American and Filipino troops within the Philippines.

Born in 1888, Homma was once a profession soldier and a person of eclectic pursuits. A tall, stern-looking guy, he had graduated from Japan’s army academy in 1907 and from its military workforce faculty in 1916, and had served as army attaché to London from 1930-32. He spoke fluent English, loved Western literature, wrote poetry, and was once an avid tennis participant. 

On Dec. 10, 1941, the primary Japanese infantry troops invaded the Philippines when a small power of Homma’s males landed on northern Luzon, the primary island. They temporarily confirmed how brutal they might be. His infantrymen entered the place of job of Buenaventura Bello, 51, an administrator at Northern College in Vigan. They ordered him to take away the American and Philippine flags from his place of job, however he refused.

“These palms are made to shield them and not to drag them down,” he mentioned.

A soldier shot him within the groin. (Bello survived.)


Subscribe to our Historynet Now! e-newsletter for the most efficient of the previous, delivered each Wednesday.

Macarthur’s protection

Homma’s major landings have been at Lingayen Gulf, north of Manila, on Dec. 22, and, two days later, at Lamon Bay, to the south. MacArthur deserted Manila on Dec. 26, mentioning it an open town to spare civilians from assault, and withdrew his forces into the 25-mile-long Bataan Peninsula, throughout Manila Bay from the capital. Homma misinterpret the retreat because the disorganized flight of defeated troops, nevertheless it was once a deliberate withdrawal through infantrymen able to struggle. MacArthur had expected creating a stand on Bataan if his males couldn’t prevent the Japanese at the invasion seashores; mountainous Bataan was once well-suited for cover, and MacArthur supposed to carry it. 

A tall and putting determine, Homma (middle) seems on Jan. 20, 1942, with Jorge B. Vargas, a Filipino flesh presser who later served as an administrator throughout the Japanese career of the Philippines. Japan’s invasion had begun the prior month. (Naval History and Heritage Command)

From January 1942 onward, MacArthur’s American and Filipino troops maintained their grip on Bataan, withstanding repeated Japanese assaults, and through early February, Homma learned he wanted extra males. Tokyo was once already impatient with him for the marketing campaign’s gradual development, and Homma was once ashamed to wish reinforcements. 

While MacArthur’s troops persevered to stymie the enemy, their state of affairs was once rising dire. A Japanese blockade of the Philippines intended the boys needed to make do with what they’d. Food was once briefly provide. Rations have been reduce to two,000 energy in step with day in January, about part of what a soldier wanted; through March, they have been down to at least one,000 energy in step with day — “near to sufficient to stay a person alive if he remains in mattress,” Army medical doctors mentioned. Medicines started to run low, and malaria and dysentery took their toll.

Homma’s Plan

Once Homma had his reinforcements in hand, he deliberate a last offensive for early April. Confident of victory, he had his workforce devise a plan to move the American and Filipino infantrymen he anticipated to seize on Bataan to jail camp. Under the plan, prisoners would bring together at Balanga, about 19 miles north of the southern tip of Bataan. From Balanga, they’d march about 35 miles north to San Fernando. From there, they’d trip through rail to a jail camp in central Luzon. On paper, the plan ready through Homma’s workforce referred to as for humane remedy of the prisoners, a workforce officer insisted. 

The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
Japanese troops advance to the entrance in Bataan in preparation for Homma’s huge April 3, 1942, offensive; defenders surrendered
days later. Despite assurances of “kindly” remedy (beneath), throngs of POWs have been then subjected to the horrors of the Bataan Death March. (Naval History and Heritage Command)
The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
(U.S. Air Force)

The U.S. War Department, too, knew the tip was once close to, and in March 1942 had ordered MacArthur to evacuate to Australia to keep away from his seize through the Japanese. Lt. Gen. Jonathan M. Wainwright changed MacArthur, and Maj. Gen. Edward P. King Jr. was once installed command on Bataan. 

On April 3, 1942, Homma introduced his offensive, and his troops sliced thru Allied strains. The American and Filipino defenders not had the energy to struggle. Almost each guy suffered from the results of extended hunger in addition to from malaria or dysentery, the manager scientific officer, Col. Wibb Cooper, recounted. Most had misplaced 20 to 30 kilos, and commanders estimated that many weren’t have compatibility sufficient to stroll 100 yards with out resting.

On April 9, 1942, Gen. King surrendered the roughly 75,000 troops on Bataan, the biggest give up in American historical past. He put aside U.S. Army vans and vehicles to move his males to jail camp, however the Japanese refused to make use of them. When King sought assurances that the Japanese would deal with his males humanely, an officer answered, “We aren’t barbarians.”

Nevertheless, King had reason why to fret as a result of Homma’s males had already proven that they steadily performed through their very own laws. They had persevered to bomb Manila after MacArthur had deserted it. Prisoners of conflict were achieved, and Japanese planes had focused an Army medical institution marked with a crimson pass. 

POW Hell

THE PLIGHT OF THE BATAAN PRISONERS temporarily degenerated into chaos. The Japanese had anticipated not more than 40,000 prisoners, however the quantity was once just about double that, they usually hadn’t expected simply how malnourished and in poor health the boys have been.

The major drawback, on the other hand, was once that Japanese infantrymen considered their captives with contempt. As Homma himself admitted, the Japanese military handled give up as without equal shame, and its infantrymen have been taught to die slightly than capitulate. Contempt resulted in harsh remedy. According to historian Charles A. Stenger, throughout the conflict, 40.4% of the American servicemen held through the Japanese died in captivity, whilst the loss of life fee for the ones held through Germany was once 1.2%. 

Homma had different issues on his thoughts, and “pastime and attention for Prisoners of War was once ‘skinny’ from Homma on down,” mentioned Col. Toshimitsu Takatsu, certainly one of Homma’s workforce officials. Homma’s activity wouldn’t be accomplished till he seized Corregidor, the island fort within the mouth of Manila Bay. As lengthy as Allied forces held Corregidor, the Japanese couldn’t use Manila Bay, one of the most best harbors in Asia. Because of mounting drive from Tokyo, Homma was preoccupied with Corregidor. Prisoners needed to be got rid of from Bataan temporarily in order that he may just carry troops and provides to southern Bataan for an amphibious attack at the island. 


Guards handled prisoners and civilians with savage fury. Sgt. Michael Bruaw heard a bunch of 25 prisoners scream as guards used them for bayonet observe. Maj. Richard Kadel noticed a terrified Filipino circle of relatives of 8 flee when shells from Corregidor exploded within reach. A patrol stuck them, and an officer held a toddler through the legs as he sliced off the baby’s head along with his sword. His males pressured the opposite seven to kneel as they beheaded them separately. 

American and Filipino prisoners marched in teams of 100 up Bataan’s two-lane Old National Road towards Balanga and San Fernando. Men struggled to take care of, however they’d no selection since the selection was once loss of life. Guards, whom the prisoners referred to as “buzzard squads,” completed off those that couldn’t pass on. 

Sgt. Baldassarre noticed a colonel stagger off the street, muttering, “I will’t make the hike anymore.” Before he went 6 toes, a guard shot him. The similar destiny happened a lieutenant who stumbled off the course murmuring, “I’m all in.” Sgt. Horace Clark watched a soldier he knew as “Big Smitty” drop from exhaustion. Big Smitty’s pals attempted to pick out him up, however guards chased them away as any other guard beheaded the helpless soldier. Maj. Bertram Bank helped elevate a weakened lieutenant colonel; a guard pressured Bank to drop the person, after which drove a bayonet during the colonel. 

The facet of the street alongside the course quickly was plagued by corpses that remained unburied for days. In the 18-mile stretch between Balanga and Lubao, as an example, Sgt. Baldassarre noticed masses of American and Filipino our bodies. If a corpse stayed at the roadway, passing vans flattened it.

The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
Japanese guards power Filipinos to view lifeless POWs. Treatment of prisoners was once brutal from the beginning, with the Death March claiming hundreds of lives. (U.S. Marine Corps/National Archives)

Guards tormented the exhausted males through rushing up the march to double-time tempo. As Japanese vans handed through, infantrymen in them reached out with golf equipment to hit prisoners. Maj. Fred Castro noticed guards throw exhausted males right into a pit. One begged for mercy because the guards pressured prisoners to fill the pit with grime, burying them alive. Near the Pantingan River, guards tied a number of hundred Filipino prisoners in combination and attacked them with swords and bayonets. Only a handful survived.

The warmth drove prisoners mad with thirst. Artesian wells dotted the course, however guards beat or killed prisoners who attempted to drink from them. Men was so parched that they drank from streams full of rotting corpses. Even leisure breaks had a sadistic twist. Guards pressured prisoners to take a seat underneath the blistering solar with out coloration, meals or water.
To Lt. William E. Dyess, a fighter pilot captured on Bataan, “we ceased to be males — extra like filthy, ravenous rabble.”

No REspite

Filipino civilians took pity at the prisoners.

“They may just rarely stroll. Some of them, they have been carried through their partners,” mentioned Fernando Ocampo, an American-educated Filipino architect.

Ocampo and his sister introduced baskets of bananas, rice truffles and hard-boiled eggs to offer to the prisoners, however a guard kicked the meals right into a ditch. When the captives scrambled to retrieve it, guards hit them with rifle butts. Prisoners noticed guards beat or kill different Filipino Good Samaritans. 

For maximum prisoners, the march to San Fernando took just about per week. The Japanese equipped meals sparingly, if in any respect. Lt .Dyess, as an example, was once fed just one mess equipment of rice all of the time. At San Fernando, the prisoners have been filled into metal boxcars for the four-hour educate experience to Camp O’Donnell, a former Philippine military base and now a jail camp. Dyess counted 115 males in a single automobile. Many suffered from dysentery, and the boxcar flooring have been lined with human waste. Guards stored the doorways locked, and males struggled to respire the recent, fetid air. They arrived at Camp O’Donnell “dehydrated, starved and within the merest rags of clothes,” Brig. Gen. James R. N. Weaver reported. No one will ever know the precise collection of males who perished at the march and the commute to Camp O’Donnell; historians estimate the loss of life toll at 10,000. 

The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
Deaths persevered after the POWs arrived at their jail at Camp O’Donnell, the place, later within the conflict (most sensible), a U.S. soldier and a conflict correspondent exposed crude grave markers. The atrocities remained unknown till Lieutenant William E. Dyess (beneath) escaped in 1943. (Bettmann/Getty Images)
The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
William E. Dyess (U.S. Air Force)

At Camp O’Donnell, the struggling persevered. The males have been inadequately fed, and illness ran rampant. Relief companies introduced meals and drugs to the camp, however the Japanese stored this stuff for themselves. By June 2, 1942, greater than 25,000 American and Filipino prisoners had died at Camp O’Donnell.

Homma ended the marketing campaign through taking pictures Corregidor on May 6, 1942. He had taken just about 5 months to complete a role anticipated to take not more than 50 days, and he paid along with his activity. On Aug. 5, 1942, he was once relieved and despatched house to Japan, the place he spent the remainder of the conflict in retirement. 


THE U.S. GOVERNMENT and the American public didn’t be told of the Death March for greater than a yr. They were given the scoop after Lieutenant Dyess escaped from Davao jail camp, at the Philippine island of Mindanao, in April 1943, made his method to Australia, and gave the primary eyewitness account of the march. When his tale hit newsstands on Jan. 28, 1944, it sparked a degree of anger now not observed because the Pearl Harbor assault. President Franklin D. Roosevelt vowed that the ones accountable would pay. Congressmen vowed vengeance. The public spoke with its pockets, and war-bond gross sales just about doubled. Homma had change into a marked guy. 

As Japan’s formal Sept. 2, 1945, give up approached, MacArthur was once despatched to Japan as Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, and a part of his activity was once to supervise the pains of Japanese conflict criminals. On Sept. 11, he ordered the arrest of 40 suspects, Homma integrated. When Homma grew to become himself in 4 days later, he instructed journalists he was once stunned to be on MacArthur’s record. As for the Death March, he mentioned, “I don’t suppose it was once this type of difficult march.” 

The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
General Douglas MacArthur arrives at Japan’s Atsugi Air Base on August 30, 1945—a number of days sooner than the formal give up—to supervise the career as Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers. His authority integrated oversight of all Japanese war-crimes trials. (National Archives)

On Nov. 4, 1945, the United States charged Homma with a conflict crime for failing to “regulate the operations of the contributors of his command, letting them dedicate brutal atrocities and different excessive crimes” towards Filipino and American infantrymen and Allied civilians. The fees specified 47 separate acts of barbarity that integrated now not handiest the Death March but in addition the mistreatment of civilians interned in Manila, overlook of prisoners at Camp O’Donnell, and the in style abuse of Filipino civilians. If convicted, Homma might be sentenced to loss of life. 

On Dec. 15, 5 generals — 4 Americans and one Filipino — have been decided on as judges for Homma’s trial. One, Philippine Maj. Gen. Basilio J. Valdes, had an awl to grind towards the Japanese. They had murdered his brother, Alejo, after they mistook him for Basilio.

An skilled litigator, 53-year-old Lt. Col. Frank E. Meek, was once named the lead prosecutor, heading a staff of 1 Filipino and 5 American officials. Maj. John H. Skeen Jr. was once decided on to go the protection staff of six junior U.S. Army officials. Skeen, a 27-year-old lawyer who had by no means attempted a felony case, had anticipated to rotate house and wasn’t extremely joyful to be protecting Homma. In a letter to his spouse, on the other hand, he promised to “give the S.O.B. the whole lot imaginable in the way in which of protection.”

All the judges, prosecutors and protection legal professionals served underneath MacArthur’s command.

In pretrial motions, Homma’s legal professionals attacked the court cases for a lot of causes, together with the foundations of proof MacArthur’s headquarters had installed position. These laws, as an example, allowed the prosecutor to provide affidavits in lieu of are living testimony — one thing impermissible in American courts as it violated the accused’s proper to confront the witnesses towards him. The problems Homma’s legal professionals raised have been already sooner than the U.S. Supreme Court on the subject of Gen. Tomoyuki Yamashita, who were sentenced on Dec. 7, 1945, to hold for the brutal acts his males dedicated when Allied forces retook Manila previous that yr. 

Homma’s legal professionals additionally challenged MacArthur’s pervasive function within the court cases: Not handiest had he ordered the trial, with the judges, prosecutors, and protection legal professionals all serving underneath him, but when a loss of life sentence have been imposed, MacArthur would come to a decision if it could be performed. Since Homma had crushed MacArthur on Bataan, they argued, MacArthur’s function within the court cases created the semblance that the trial was once about revenge for that defeat, now not justice. The judges denied those motions and ordered the case to continue. 

witness to fact

THE TRIAL BEGAN on Jan. 3, 1946, in Manila’s excessive commissioner’s place of abode, nonetheless pockmarked with injury from the preventing to recapture Manila. To Lt. Robert L. Pelz, one of the most protection legal professionals, the 57-year-old Homma appeared like “a tired-out grandfather who has girded his loins for a final combat.” 

No one contended that Homma had ordered any atrocities or participated in any. He was once charged as a result of he commanded the boys who had dedicated those crimes and had accomplished not anything to prevent them. While a commander’s accountability to regulate his troops was once well-established, the breadth of command duty was once a murky factor. The uncertainty was once whether or not a commander was once mechanically accountable for his males’s misconduct or whether or not he was once criminally accountable provided that he knew, or must have identified, what his troops have been doing. In his opening commentary, prosecutor Meek promised to turn out that Homma had had exact wisdom of his males’s misdeeds. Their brutality was once “so in style and so vast in development and design and so steady,” he argued, that Homma needed to have identified.

Next, Meek moved to again up his phrases with proof. He confirmed that Homma’s headquarters at Balanga have been 500 yards from the march course — so shut, Meek asserted, that if he “cared to pay attention he can have heard the screams of the wounded and the death.” But Meek sought after one thing extra direct to turn out Homma’s wisdom, and Sgt. Baldassarre and a Filipino captain equipped it. 

Baldassarre recalled a lot of Japanese officials in workforce vehicles passing the prisoners throughout the march and described seeing one high-ranking officer at the march course close to San Fernando. A Japanese soldier instructed him it was once Homma. When requested at trial if the high-ranking officer he had observed was once within the court, Baldassarre pointed at Homma and mentioned, “He is correct there now, sir.”

The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
At Homma’s trial, Buenaventura Bello (status, middle) presentations the American flag Japanese invaders ripped from a wall after capturing him when he refused to transport it. (Bettmann/Getty Images)

Capt. Alberto Abeleda described a identical incident. On the course close to Lubao, Abeleda noticed a “large, flashy automobile” prevent in entrance of a warehouse. Japanese infantrymen snapped to consideration as an officer were given out of the auto, spoke to certainly one of them, after which left. Abeleda described the officer as a large guy, and Homma stood simply over 6 toes tall. Abeleda instructed the judges he later noticed Homma’s photograph in a Manila newspaper and known him because the officer he had observed. 

This testimony harm Homma’s purpose badly. Numerous witnesses had described how the march course was once strewn with corpses, implying that no person who traveled that highway can have neglected seeing them. If Homma had observed the ones corpses, he knew his males have been working amok and had a prison accountability to prevent the carnage.


Subscribe to our Historynet Now! e-newsletter for the most efficient of the previous, delivered each Wednesday.

between lifestyles and loss of life

ON JAN. 21, the prosecution rested. It was once now the protection’s flip, and Homma’s legal professionals sought to ascertain that Homma were unaware of what his males have been doing. Surprisingly, the protection often known as a number of of Homma’s underlings to take a look at to turn that the march wasn’t all that dangerous — an not possible place in mild of the cruel prerequisites that a lot of survivors had already described. 

Maj. Moriya Wada swore that fewer than 30 prisoners perished at the march and that they’d died from illness, now not mistreatment. Col. Yoshio Nakajima insisted he noticed prisoners close to Balanga resting within the coloration and consuming Japanese rations whilst different prisoners swam in a close-by move. Col. Seiichi Ohta maintained that guards gave the boys plentiful meals and water and allowed them to leisure as wanted. Homma’s leader of workforce, Takeji Wachi, went additional, insisting that guards helped drained prisoners to the facet of the street to leisure or onto vans to experience to San Fernando. These witnesses all had a purpose to misinform keep away from being charged with conflict crimes themselves. 

HOmma Speaks

One month into the trial, on Feb. 4, Homma took the stand to insist he hadn’t realized of the march’s horrors till listening to the survivors’ testimony. He portrayed himself as a figurehead with restricted authority over his subordinates. Preoccupied with Corregidor, he had depended on those subordinates, he claimed, they usually hadn’t reported any mistreatment to him.

“I’m ashamed of myself must those atrocities have took place,” he mentioned.

He admitted touring at the march course on a number of events however claimed, “[m]y reminiscence at the level is moderately difficult to understand.”

He denied seeing any corpses.

“I used to be now not searching for them in particular,” he defined. 

The similar day Homma took the stand, the protection were given dangerous information when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to intrude within the Yamashita case. Since that case raised the similar problems as Homma’s, it was once now not likely the excessive courtroom would pay attention his legal professionals’ motions. 

As the trial neared its finish, the protection attempted to humanize its consumer through calling Homma’s 42-year-old spouse, Fujiko, to testify that her husband wasn’t the type of individual to countenance atrocities.

“I’m happy with the truth that I’m the spouse of Gen. Homma,” she mentioned, as Homma wept at recommend desk.

Mrs. Homma, described through a reporter as a tiny, kimono-clad lady who spoke “animatedly and earnestly,” was once this type of sympathetic determine, prosecutor Meek later remarked, that he was once “by no means so happy in all my reviews in courtroom to have a witness get off the stand.”

The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
Homma’s spouse, Fujiko—right here at her husband’s facet—testified on his behalf and later made an immediate attraction to MacArthur to spare his lifestyles. (AP Photo/Max Desfor)

The Verdict

Feb. 11 was once resolution day. Homma stood as the manager pass judgement on, Maj. Gen. Leo Donovan, solemnly introduced that they discovered him in charge and sentenced him to be “shot to loss of life with musketry.”

That similar day, the Supreme Court refused to listen to Homma’s case, which got rid of the remaining prison impediment to Homma being punished through army judges running underneath the foundations set through MacArthur’s headquarters. Two justices, Frank Murphy and Wiley Rutledge, disagreed and condemned the court cases.

“Hasty, revengeful motion isn’t the American manner,” they mentioned, and when compared the pains of Homma and different Japanese officials to “blood purges” and “judicial lynchings.”

Homma’s destiny now rested with MacArthur. As splendid commander, he would come to a decision if Homma could be achieved or spared. Fujiko Homma traveled to Tokyo to plead her husband’s case, and MacArthur met along with her on March 11. She was once a “cultured lady of significant non-public allure,” he mentioned, and he referred to as the assembly “one of the vital attempting hours of my lifestyles.” He promised to offer “the gravest attention” to what she had mentioned.

Notwithstanding Mrs. Homma’s pleas, MacArthur affirmed the conviction and loss of life sentence 10 days later.

“If this defendant does now not deserve his judicial destiny, none in jurisdictional historical past ever did,” he mentioned. “There may also be no better, extra heinous or extra unhealthy crime than the mass destruction, underneath guise of army authority … of helpless males.”

As for the court cases themselves, “no trial can have been fairer than this one,” MacArthur mentioned.

The sentence was once performed at 1 a.m. on April 3, 1946, at Los Baños, a former internment camp south of Manila. MPs led Homma, palms sure in the back of his again, into the backyard and tied him to a publish. He was once “calm and stoical,” a reporter famous, and refused to make a last commentary. A black hood was once positioned over his head, and a military physician put a four-inch spherical goal over his middle. On command, 12 infantrymen status 15 paces away fired.

“Army precision marked the bleak, just about silent drama,” the Associated Press reported. 

justice served?

SINCE 1946, HISTORIANS and prison commentators have had harsh phrases for Homma’s trial. The proof was once sturdy sufficient to permit the judges to seek out that Homma knew what his troops have been doing, so the end result may had been the similar without reference to the cases. MacArthur’s pervasive function, on the other hand, created an unsettling look of unfairness and bias, resulting in a preordained outcome. 

Homma had crushed MacArthur on Bataan, the one time the Japanese had defeated the U.S. Army in a big marketing campaign and the one battlefield loss MacArthur had ever suffered. The judges spoke back to MacArthur, and MacArthur’s laws of proof wouldn’t have handed muster in an American courtroom. An skilled prosecutor was once pitted towards a court amateur, and only one individual — MacArthur — had the ability to spare Homma’s lifestyles. The deck seemed to be stacked. D. Clayton James, a revered biographer of MacArthur, referred to as the trial a miscarriage of justice, and William Manchester, any other distinguished MacArthur biographer, went as far as to conclude that Homma was once convicted through a kangaroo courtroom “which flouted justice with the Supreme Commander’s approval and almost definitely at his urging.” 

Sgt. Baldassarre, on the other hand, shed no tears. In truth, he didn’t perceive why Homma deserved a tribulation in any respect. The Japanese “by no means trialed us. They killed other folks like flies” and gave the prisoners “not anything however bullets and bayonets,” he instructed journalists throughout the trial. To the crusty sergeant, a ranking were settled. 

The Bataan Death March War Crimes Trial: Was It Fair?
Standing along with his lead American lawyer, Major John H. Skeen Jr., at left, Homma learns that he has been sentenced to be “shot to loss of life with musketry.” (AP Photo/Max Desfor)

Source link

Source link

Leave a Reply