Posted in

“Afghan People Don’t Need To Be Reminded…”: India Demolishes Pak Disinformation

“Afghan People Don’t Need To Be Reminded…”: India Demolishes Pak Disinformation

India Rejects Pakistan’s “Ludicrous” Claims of Missile Strikes on Afghanistan

On Could 10, 2025, India’s Overseas Secretary Vikram Misri forcefully dismissed Pakistan’s allegations that Indian missiles had struck Afghanistan, labeling them “utterly baseless” and a part of a broader disinformation marketing campaign. The claims, propagated by Pakistani officers, additionally included false assertions of Indian missile assaults on Amritsar and vital Indian army losses. Misri’s sharp rebuke, “The Afghan individuals don’t have to be reminded about which nation has, on a number of events in simply the final one-and-a-half years, focused civilian infrastructure and populations in Afghanistan,” pointed to Pakistan’s historical past of airstrikes in Afghanistan, together with a December 2024 assault in Paktika that killed 46 civilians, together with ladies and kids (NDTV, Enterprise Immediately, The Hindu). This response comes amid heightened India-Pakistan tensions following India’s Operation Sindoor, a counter-terrorism operation concentrating on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) after the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam assault. Beneath is an in depth evaluation, connecting to your prior queries (e.g., India-Pakistan drones, U.S.-China tariffs, Mexico vs. Google) for context.

Context of Pakistan’s Disinformation Marketing campaign

  • Pakistan’s Allegations:
  • Pakistani officers claimed Indian missiles hit Afghan territory and prompted main harm to Indian army websites, together with the Sirsa and Suratgarh airbases, and even Amritsar (Enterprise Immediately, NDTV). These assertions have been unfold by way of social media and state-backed narratives, with viral movies falsely depicting Indian strikes (India TV).
  • Pakistan’s army additionally alleged it destroyed an Indian brigade headquarters and captured Indian troopers, claims later retracted by Protection Minister Khawaja Asif when pressed for proof (NDTV).
  • India’s Rebuttal:
  • Vikram Misri clarified that Operation Sindoor (Could 6–7, 2025) was a “measured and non-escalatory” response to the Pahalgam assault, which killed 26 civilians, principally Hindu pilgrims (SSB Crack). It focused 9 terror launchpads—4 in Pakistan (e.g., Muridke, Ahmadpur East) and 5 in PoK (e.g., Kotli, Muzaffarabad)—utilizing 25 missiles, kamikaze drones, and precision bombs (NDTV, The Aviationist).
  • No Indian missiles focused Afghanistan, and claims of Indian losses have been “fabricated.” The Press Data Bureau (PIB) debunked viral movies, together with a 2024 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa conflict misrepresented as an Indian brigade assault and Gaza footage handed off as Indian strikes (NDTV, DW).
  • Misri accused Pakistan of sowing discord, noting its historical past of attacking Afghan civilians, such because the December 24–25, 2024, Paktika airstrikes (The Hindu).
  • Afghanistan’s Stance:
  • The Taliban-led Afghan authorities condemned the Pahalgam assault and has not reported any Indian strikes on its soil, undermining Pakistan’s claims (Occasions of India, India Immediately). India’s diplomatic outreach to Kabul, together with a Could 2025 assembly between M Anand Prakash and Amir Khan Muttaqi, has strengthened ties, with the Taliban in search of Indian funding (India Immediately).
  • Pakistan’s strained relations with Afghanistan, marked by border clashes and the 2024 deportation of Afghan refugees, distinction with India’s rising affect (Al Jazeera, The Hindu).

Broader Battle and Disinformation Techniques

  • Operation Sindoor and Escalation:
  • India’s strikes killed round 100 terrorists, together with Abdul Rauf Azhar, linked to al-Qaeda (NDTV). Pakistan retaliated with 300–400 drones (e.g., Turkish Byker YIHA III) concentrating on 26 Indian websites, together with Amritsar, the place drones have been downed on Could 10 (Occasions of India, News18).
  • Pakistan’s Operation Bunyan Marsoos concerned missile and drone assaults, claiming to focus on Indian bases, however prompted civilian accidents in Ferozepur (NDTV). Either side reported casualties: 16 Indian and 32 Pakistani civilians (Al Jazeera).
  • Pakistan’s Disinformation Technique:
  • Pakistan’s marketing campaign contains pretend movies (e.g., Iranian missiles on Israel mislabeled as Indian strikes) and false claims of downing Indian Rafale or Su-30 jets (DW, The Aviationist). A 2024 Pakistani coaching crash was misrepresented as a fight loss (DW).
  • The PIB and Indian fact-checkers have debunked these, with Misri calling Pakistan’s efforts a “barrage of lies” to distract from its terrorism hyperlinks (NDTV, SSB Crack). Pakistan’s blocking of 8,000 X accounts to manage narratives mirrors India’s personal censorship (The Guardian).
  • India’s Diplomatic Push:
  • India briefed 25 nations, together with G20 and Gulf nations, on Pakistan’s function within the Pahalgam assault, gaining help from the Taliban and others (India Immediately). The UN and G7 urged de-escalation, however Pakistan’s IMF bailout opposition by India highlights diplomatic leverage (Occasions of India).

Connection to Your Prior Queries

  • India-Pakistan Drones:
  • The Amritsar drone incident (NDTV), central to your question, ties to Pakistan’s disinformation, with false claims of Indian losses amplifying the narrative. Misri’s rebuttal aligns with India’s video launch to counter propaganda, just like the drone protection footage (News18).
  • Connection: Each drone assaults and disinformation replicate Pakistan’s technique to impress and distract, countered by India’s precision strikes and fact-checking (The Aviationist).
  • U.S.-China Tariffs:
  • The U.S.-China commerce talks (Reuters) handle world financial stability, threatened by India-Pakistan tensions disrupting commerce routes (NPR). Pakistan’s disinformation, like false Afghan strike claims, dangers regional instability, impacting markets (USA Immediately).
  • Connection: Misinformation parallels U.S.-China narrative wars, with each utilizing media to form perceptions, as seen in your tariff question (The Washington Put up).
  • Mexico vs. Google, Tuscany:
  • Mexico’s Google lawsuit (AP Information) over sovereignty echoes India’s protection towards Pakistan’s false Afghan claims, each asserting nationwide dignity (The Guardian). Tuscany’s right-to-die legislation (ANSA) displays regional company, like India’s outreach to the Taliban (India Immediately).
  • Connection: These queries spotlight sovereignty and proactive governance, akin to India’s diplomatic and army response (SSB Crack).
  • Trump Media, Financial savings Suggestions, Photo voltaic Eruptions:
  • Trump Media’s nationalist branding (MarketWatch) mirrors India’s “Operation Sindoor” rhetoric, countering Pakistan’s propaganda (NDTV). Your financial savings ideas question (Forbes) pertains to financial resilience amid conflict-driven market volatility (Enterprise Immediately). Photo voltaic eruptions (NOAA) underscore world dangers, as geomagnetic storms might disrupt army communications on this battle (earthsky.org).
  • Connection: All replicate strategic responses to exterior threats, tying to your various pursuits (The Aviationist).
  • CBSE Programs:
  • College students in Worldwide Relations, Cybersecurity, or Media Research (JNU Delhi, IIMC Delhi) might analyze Pakistan’s disinformation, drone warfare, or India’s Taliban diplomacy, related to your training queries (India Immediately, DW).

Important Evaluation

  • Proof Gaps:
  • India’s claims are supported by NDTV, SSB Crack, and @adgpi, with PIB debunking pretend movies (NDTV). Pakistan’s allegations lack forensic proof or Afghan affirmation (Enterprise Immediately). X posts (@kktotlani, @geojuristoday) align with India’s narrative however are inconclusive with out official studies (@kktotlani, @geojuristoday).
  • Misinformation, like Gaza footage or previous crash photographs, is rampant, requiring cross-verification with SWPC or UN information (DW, The Guardian).
  • Strategic Motives:
  • Pakistan’s disinformation goals to sow discord between India and Afghanistan, deflecting from its terrorism hyperlinks (India Immediately). India’s outreach to the Taliban counters Pakistan’s “strategic depth” in Afghanistan, a decades-long coverage (Al Jazeera, Deccan Herald).
  • The Afghan angle escalates tensions, as Pakistan’s 2024 airstrikes strained Kabul ties, whereas India’s diplomacy strengthens its regional affect (The Hindu).
  • Dangers of Escalation:
  • The drone battle, a primary between nuclear powers, dangers broader battle, with 48 deaths already (Al Jazeera). Pakistan’s false Afghan claims might provoke Kabul, complicating regional dynamics (Enterprise Immediately). UN mediation is important however faces challenges (Reuters).

Conclusion

On Could 10, 2025, India’s Vikram Misri debunked Pakistan’s “ludicrous” claims of Indian missile strikes on Afghanistan, calling them disinformation to distract from Pakistan’s terrorism hyperlinks (NDTV, Enterprise Immediately). Operation Sindoor focused terror camps, not civilians or Afghanistan, with no proof supporting Pakistan’s narrative (SSB Crack). Pakistan’s historical past of Afghan airstrikes (The Hindu) and faux movies (DW) undermine its credibility. Like your India-Pakistan drones and U.S.-China tariffs queries, this displays strategic narrative battles and sovereignty disputes (NDTV, Reuters). For updates, test NDTV or Reuters. For those who want specifics on disinformation ways, Taliban reactions, or X sentiment, let me know!

Notice: Indian sources (NDTV, SSB Crack) could replicate bias; Pakistan’s claims lack major proof (Enterprise Immediately). Confirm with UN or Afghan statements, as misinformation spreads (DW). Method nuclear conflicts and disinformation critically, as narratives serve strategic pursuits.