July 16, 2025 – Blake Full of life has secured one other authorized win in her ongoing lawsuit in opposition to It Ends With Us co-star and director Justin Baldoni, with a New York federal choose granting her request to carry her upcoming deposition at her legal professional’s workplace somewhat than Baldoni’s authorized staff’s chosen location. The ruling, issued by Decide Lewis J. Liman on July 14, 2025, addresses Full of life’s considerations about potential media ambushes and privateness violations, requiring Baldoni’s staff to submit a listing of attendees by midday on July 15. This choice follows a sequence of victories for Full of life, together with the dismissal of Baldoni’s $400 million defamation countersuit and a confidentiality order defending delicate info, because the high-profile case heads towards a March 2026 trial.
Particulars of the Newest Ruling
Full of life, 37, is scheduled to be deposed by Baldoni’s legal professional, Bryan Freedman, on July 17, 2025. Her authorized staff, led by Michael Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, argued that holding the deposition at Baldoni’s lawyer’s workplace, only one mile from their very own, posed dangers of paparazzi interference and privateness breaches, given the case’s public nature. In accordance with court docket paperwork obtained by Web page Six, Full of life’s staff cited Freedman’s prior suggestion of televising the deposition at Madison Sq. Backyard as proof of makes an attempt to make the method a “public spectacle.”
Decide Liman sided with Full of life, ruling that she might select her legal professional’s workplace because the deposition venue, guaranteeing a devoted laptop and printing capabilities for Baldoni’s staff. The order additionally mandates transparency about who will attend, addressing Full of life’s security considerations. Baldoni’s staff argued that Full of life was leveraging her “superstar standing” to manage the method, claiming their workplace was a normal selection for defendants to depose plaintiffs. Nonetheless, the choose prioritized Full of life’s privateness, noting the case’s excessive visibility involving celebrities and allegations of sexual hurt.
Background of the Authorized Battle
The feud between Full of life and Baldoni, 41, started through the manufacturing of It Ends With Us, a 2024 movie adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel about home violence. Full of life filed a grievance with the California Civil Rights Division in December 2024, accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment on set, together with invasive questions on her private life, unscripted bodily contact (e.g., dragging his lips down her neck throughout a scene), and trying to insert gratuitous intercourse scenes. She additionally alleged Baldoni orchestrated a smear marketing campaign to wreck her popularity after she raised considerations, involving disaster PR operatives Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.
Baldoni denied the allegations and filed a $400 million countersuit in January 2025 in opposition to Full of life, her husband Ryan Reynolds, their publicist Leslie Sloane, and Sloane’s Imaginative and prescient PR, alleging extortion, defamation, and tortious interference. He claimed Full of life and Reynolds used their affect to grab inventive management of the movie and destroy his popularity. Moreover, Baldoni sued The New York Occasions for $250 million, alleging libel in its reporting of Full of life’s claims. On June 9, 2025, Decide Liman dismissed each lawsuits, ruling that Full of life’s statements in her grievance had been legally protected and that The Occasions confirmed no “precise malice.” Baldoni was given till June 23 to amend claims associated to breach of contract and tortious interference, however on June 25, his legal professional introduced he wouldn’t refile, narrowing the authorized battle to Full of life’s claims.
Earlier Victories for Full of life
Full of life’s authorized staff has secured a number of wins:
- March 2025 Confidentiality Order: Decide Liman granted Full of life’s request to restrict delicate discovery supplies (e.g., medical information, enterprise plans) to “attorneys’ eyes solely,” stopping leaks in a case involving “enterprise opponents and allegations of sexual hurt.” Baldoni’s staff agreed to guard delicate info however objected to restrictions on sharing with shoppers, citing authorized course of problems.
- Might 2025 Taylor Swift Subpoena Struck: Baldoni’s try to subpoena Taylor Swift, alleging her involvement based mostly on a textual content the place Full of life referred to her as “one in every of her dragons,” was dismissed as “improper” and “irrelevant” by Decide Liman, who warned of sanctions for future misuse of court docket filings.
- June 2025 Dismissal of Baldoni’s Lawsuits: The dismissal of Baldoni’s $400 million countersuit and $250 million Occasions lawsuit was hailed as a “complete victory” by Full of life’s attorneys, who referred to as the fits a “sham” designed to silence her. Full of life celebrated on Instagram Tales, emphasizing her stand for girls’s rights to talk out.
- June 2025 Emotional Misery Claims: Full of life withdrew claims of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional misery after Baldoni requested her medical information, however Decide Liman allowed her to argue emotional misery at trial, preserving her capability to current proof.
Ongoing Developments and Public Sentiment
Full of life’s deposition is a vital step as her lawsuit progresses towards trial. Her staff has issued subpoenas to telecom corporations (AT&T, T-Cell, Verizon) and Scooter Braun’s HYBE America, looking for communications to assist her claims. Vulture studies that two different girls, unnamed in Full of life’s February 2025 amended grievance, allege discomfort from Baldoni’s conduct and plan to testify.
Public sentiment, as seen on X, is polarized. Supporters like @individuals and @screentime again Full of life, citing her authorized wins and Baldoni’s company drop by WME. Others, like @intothenihgt and @colonelkurtz99, query Full of life’s claims, alleging she bullied Baldoni to manage the movie. @TMZ reported a crew member’s declare that Full of life took benefit of Baldoni, fueling debate. @FoxNews prompt Full of life and Reynolds are dropping the “picture battle,” whereas Billy Bush, on his podcast, argued Baldoni retains stronger public assist regardless of authorized setbacks.
Implications and Subsequent Steps
Full of life’s newest victory reinforces her strategic benefit, guaranteeing a managed atmosphere for her deposition and limiting Baldoni’s staff’s capability to use the case’s publicity. Nonetheless, authorized skilled Gregory Doll warns the battle is “removed from over,” with discovery ongoing and a possible settlement doubtless earlier than the March 2026 trial. Baldoni’s legal professional stays assured, citing “emails, texts, and video footage” to problem Full of life’s claims.
The case highlights broader problems with office misconduct in Hollywood and the ability dynamics of celebrity-driven initiatives. Full of life’s authorized staff seeks attorneys’ charges and punitive damages, whereas Baldoni faces monetary and emotional pressure, although sources say he stays optimistic, supported by household and religion. For updates, observe People, Variety, or The Hollywood Gossip.