Government Shutdown Derails New Mexico’s Landmark PFAS Cleanup Lawsuit Against Air Force
As the U.S. federal government barrels into its third week of shutdown chaos, a pivotal environmental battleground in New Mexico grinds to a halt. The ongoing impasse has frozen deadlines in the state’s trailblazing lawsuit seeking millions in Superfund reimbursements for toxic PFAS contamination from military bases, leaving contaminated communities in limbo.
The case, filed in federal court and overseen as part of the national PFAS multidistrict litigation in Charleston, South Carolina, represents a first-of-its-kind push under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). New Mexico amended its complaint last year to demand the U.S. Air Force and Army cover cleanup costs for groundwater pollution at sites like Cannon Air Force Base near Clovis. This “groundbreaking PFAS case” could set precedents for holding the Department of Defense accountable nationwide, but U.S. District Judge Martha Pacold granted the Department of Justice’s emergency request on October 14 to suspend all deadlines amid the shutdown.
PFAS, dubbed “forever chemicals” for their persistence in the environment and human body, stem largely from decades of military use in firefighting foams at bases like Cannon and Holloman. These substances have leached into the Ogallala Aquifer, tainting drinking water for tens of thousands, poisoning dairy herds, and elevating health risks including cancer, thyroid disease, and developmental issues in children. New Mexico’s suit seeks not just reimbursement for investigations and carcass disposals—totaling over $2 million so far—but also mandates for water treatment systems, new pipelines, and stormwater barriers to stem further spread.
The lawsuit’s roots trace back to 2019, when state regulators first documented alarming PFAS levels around Cannon, where a 4-mile plume contaminated local farms and forced the euthanasia of thousands of cows. Despite the Air Force acknowledging the foam as the source, compliance with state cleanup orders has been spotty, prompting repeated fines and legal escalations. In June 2025, New Mexico leveraged new state laws designating PFAS foams as hazardous waste to file fresh claims, positioning the case as a potential bellwether for over 500 similar PFAS actions consolidated in federal court. An August 2025 state study further revealed elevated PFAS in residents’ blood near Cannon, underscoring the urgency.
Legal experts view this as a watershed moment. “New Mexico’s CERCLA claims could force the federal government to foot the bill for restoration on a scale unseen before,” said environmental attorney Rebecca Tomasovic, who tracks PFAS litigation for the Sierra Club. “It’s innovative because it treats military pollution like any other Superfund site, piercing sovereign immunity barriers.” The DOJ had already sought delays in September to assess EPA rules on PFAS as hazardous under CERCLA, but the shutdown—triggered October 1 over stalled appropriations—has amplified the roadblocks, furloughing non-essential staff and halting discovery.
Public outcry has swelled on social media, with New Mexico residents venting frustration over the double whammy of pollution and political gridlock. One X post from a Clovis farmer read, “Shutdown stops our fight against forever chemicals? Meanwhile, my well’s still poison. Congress, do your job.” Dairy operators like Art and Renee Schaap, co-plaintiffs in the suit, have filed motions for summary judgment on $80,000 in initial testing costs, only to see them paused. Advocacy groups like Conservation Voters New Mexico decry the delay as “unacceptable,” arguing it burdens taxpayers with interim cleanup while the feds dither.
For everyday Americans, especially in the Southwest, the stakes ripple far beyond New Mexico’s borders. Economically, the shutdown exacerbates strains on rural agriculture—PFAS has already slashed dairy revenues by millions, and delayed reimbursements could bankrupt small farms reliant on contaminated land. Lifestyle disruptions hit hard: Families near bases face bottled-water dependency, with health monitoring costs soaring. Politically, it spotlights partisan rifts over funding, with Democrats pushing for ACA extensions and Republicans eyeing spending cuts, turning environmental justice into collateral damage. Technologically, the case highlights gaps in military foam alternatives, as the Pentagon’s phase-out lags despite 2025 mandates.
The broader PFAS crisis affects over 700 U.S. military sites, with the EPA designating key compounds like PFOA and PFOS as hazardous in April 2025, yet full cleanups remain elusive. New Mexico’s suit, if unpaused, could compel nationwide action, including aquifer restoration and liability declarations that pressure manufacturers like 3M, already facing thousands of related claims.
As the government shutdown stretches into its 20th day, optimism for resolution dims with Congress recessed until at least October 20. Furloughed DOJ attorneys mean no motion filings or depositions, potentially pushing trial dates into 2026. New Mexico officials, undeterred, vow to refile aggressively once funding resumes. Environment Secretary James Kenney warned, “Delays deepen the damage—our water and health can’t wait on Washington infighting.” If the case prevails post-reopening, it could unlock federal coffers for Superfund sites coast-to-coast, signaling a tougher stance on legacy polluters. Yet prolonged stasis risks eroding public trust and emboldening polluters, underscoring how fiscal brinkmanship can sabotage environmental safeguards for generations.
By Sam Michael
Follow and subscribe to us to increase push notifications.
government shutdown, PFAS case, New Mexico lawsuit, CERCLA claims, Air Force contamination, forever chemicals, Superfund reimbursement, environmental litigation, Cannon Air Force Base, toxic foam cleanup