Here’s the secret Powell, Trump and Bessent aren’t telling us about gold and bitcoin

The claim of a “secret” involving Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, President Donald Trump, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding gold and Bitcoin appears to stem from speculation and fragmented narratives circulating in media and online discussions, particularly on platforms like X. Based on the available information, there is no definitive evidence of a coordinated secret among these figures. Instead, the phrase likely refers to a mix of policy shifts, market dynamics, and public statements about gold and Bitcoin as strategic assets, with some sources hinting at potential economic strategies that remain unconfirmed or speculative. Below, I’ll analyze the context, drawing on relevant web and X post data, to clarify what might be implied by this “secret” and critically examine the establishment narrative.

Context and Key Developments

Bitcoin Strategic Reserve and Policy Shifts:

  • Trump’s Bitcoin Initiative: In March 2025, President Trump issued an executive order establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, leveraging approximately $15–$20 billion in seized Bitcoin, primarily from criminal operations like Silk Road and the Bitfinex hack. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent clarified on August 14, 2025, that the U.S. would not purchase additional Bitcoin with taxpayer funds but would retain confiscated assets and halt sales of existing holdings. This marked a shift from earlier campaign promises that some interpreted as supporting active Bitcoin purchases, leading to accusations of backtracking among crypto advocates.
  • Bessent’s Statements: Bessent described the Bitcoin reserve as a move to bring the U.S. into the “21st century,” comparing it to gold as a store of value. He emphasized budget-neutral strategies, such as using forfeited assets, and suggested legislative efforts to codify how the government manages digital assets alongside traditional reserves like gold. This has fueled speculation about a broader economic strategy involving both assets.

Gold and Monetary Policy:

  • Trump and Bessent’s Pressure on the Fed: Both Trump and Bessent have publicly pushed for aggressive Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, with Bessent advocating for 150–175 basis points starting with a 50-point cut in September 2025, citing a cooling labor market and inflation below the Fed’s 2% target. Trump has criticized Powell’s hawkish stance, reportedly considering his replacement, with Bessent among 11 potential candidates. This pressure coincides with discussions about gold’s role as a hedge against economic uncertainty.
  • Gold Revaluation Speculation: An X post from @StephanieStarrC on August 13, 2025, referenced a Federal Reserve note discussing the revaluation of gold and foreign exchange reserves from their 1973 book value ($42.22 per ounce) to current market prices (approximately $2,500 per ounce). Bessent, in an August 14, 2025, Fox Business interview, doubted revaluing the U.S.’s 261.5 million ounces of gold (worth ~$750 billion at market prices) but affirmed its role as a store of value. An X post from @stackhodler on August 8, 2025, speculated that the Trump administration could engineer a gold price surge through tariffs, revalue gold holdings, and use proceeds to buy Bitcoin, though no evidence confirms this strategy.

Market Dynamics and Speculation:

  • Bitcoin’s Resilience: Bitcoin’s price surged to $122,000 in August 2025, driven by bullish sentiment and expectations of Fed rate cuts, before dropping to $117,794 after Bessent’s remarks ruling out new Bitcoin purchases. Bessent’s comparison of Bitcoin to gold as a “store of value” on April 5, 2025, echoed by Fed Chair Powell’s December 2024 comment likening Bitcoin to “digital gold,” has fueled market speculation about their roles in U.S. economic policy.
  • Gold’s Bullish Setup: Trump’s August 2025 tariffs on imported gold bars, noted in an X post by @deepdownanlyz, drove gold prices higher, reinforcing its status as a safe-haven asset amid dollar volatility. The combination of tariffs, a $300 billion monthly deficit, and calls for loose monetary policy creates a supportive backdrop for gold, as detailed in Investing.com reports.

The Alleged “Secret”

The “secret” implied in the query likely refers to speculative theories about a coordinated strategy to manipulate gold and Bitcoin markets for economic or political gain, possibly involving:

  • Gold Revaluation and Bitcoin Swap: The @stackhodler post suggests a plan to inflate gold prices through tariffs, revalue U.S. gold reserves, and use the proceeds to bolster the Bitcoin reserve. This would theoretically strengthen the U.S.’s position in digital assets without direct taxpayer costs. However, Bessent’s explicit rejection of gold revaluation and Bitcoin purchases undermines this theory, and no concrete evidence supports it.
  • Monetary Policy Manipulation: Trump’s pressure on Powell, including threats to fire him, and Bessent’s candidacy for Fed Chair, suggest an intent to align monetary policy with administration goals. This could involve using gold and Bitcoin as hedges against inflation or dollar devaluation, especially given Trump’s tariff-driven economic policies. The lack of transparency in these discussions fuels speculation about hidden motives.
  • Crypto Policy Ambiguity: The absence of detailed plans in the White House’s July 2025 crypto report, despite a 180-day deadline set by Trump’s executive order, has led to distrust among crypto advocates. Bessent’s offhand remark about not buying Bitcoin, coupled with the administration’s focus on the GENIUS Act and stablecoin regulations, suggests a more cautious approach than promised, potentially concealing a strategic pivot.

Critical Analysis

The narrative of a “secret” lacks substantiation and appears driven by market speculation and fragmented public statements. Key points to consider:

  • No Coordinated Conspiracy: Bessent’s public statements, Powell’s cautious acknowledgment of Bitcoin as “digital gold,” and Trump’s focus on tariffs and Fed pressure are disconnected actions, not evidence of a unified plan. The administration’s transparency about using seized Bitcoin and retaining gold as stores of value counters claims of secrecy.
  • Market-Driven Speculation: Gold and Bitcoin price movements are more likely driven by market reactions to tariffs, inflation data, and Fed policy expectations than a deliberate government scheme. For instance, Bitcoin’s drop after Bessent’s August 14 remarks reflects trader disappointment rather than a hidden agenda.
  • Policy Constraints: Legal and political barriers, such as the Federal Reserve’s independence and congressional oversight, limit the administration’s ability to execute drastic moves like gold revaluation or massive Bitcoin purchases. Bessent’s emphasis on budget-neutral strategies suggests fiscal caution, not a covert plan.
  • X Post Limitations: Posts like @stackhodler’s gold-Bitcoin swap theory are speculative and lack corroboration from official sources. While they reflect public interest, they cannot be taken as factual without evidence.

Conclusion

There is no verifiable “secret” involving Powell, Trump, and Bessent about gold and Bitcoin. Instead, the phrase likely captures public speculation around the administration’s Bitcoin reserve, gold’s role as a store of value, and monetary policy tensions. The Trump administration’s policies—halting Bitcoin sales, pushing for Fed rate cuts, and imposing gold tariffs—suggest a strategic focus on alternative assets amid economic volatility, but these are openly discussed, not hidden. Bessent’s comparison of Bitcoin to gold and the Fed’s potential revaluation discussions are notable but do not indicate a conspiracy. For the latest developments, check reputable financial news or the Treasury’s official statements at home.treasury.gov. If you have specific details or sources suggesting otherwise, please share, and I can dig deeper!

Leave a Comment