Posted in

How World Reacted To Terror Attack In Kashmir That Left 26 Dead

How World Reacted To Terror Attack In Kashmir That Left 26 Dead

A Cry Heard Across the Globe

On April 22, 2025, the serene Baisaran meadow in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, turned a scene of unimaginable horror. A gaggle of 4 to 6 militants, linked to The Resistance Entrance (TRF), an offshoot of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, opened fireplace on vacationers, killing at the very least 26 civilians, together with 24 Indian vacationers, two locals, and two overseas nationals—one from the UAE and one from Nepal. The assault, the deadliest within the Kashmir Valley because the 2019 Pulwama strike, drew swift and unequivocal condemnation from world leaders, who expressed solidarity with India and grief for the victims. Because the information unfold, the worldwide response was a mixture of sorrow, outrage, and requires justice, set towards the backdrop of a world already grappling with financial and geopolitical tensions.

In New Delhi, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who minimize brief his go to to Saudi Arabia, condemned the “heinous act” on X, vowing that “these accountable might be dropped at justice.” He spoke with Dwelling Minister Amit Shah, who rushed to Srinagar for an pressing safety assembly with Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha. Abdullah known as the assault “surprising past perception,” noting it was “a lot bigger than something we’ve seen directed at civilians lately.”

The USA responded with drive. President Donald Trump, posting on Fact Social, known as the assault “deeply disturbing” and pledged full U.S. assist, stating, “The USA stands sturdy with India towards terrorism.” Vice President JD Vance, on a private go to to India along with his spouse Usha, expressed condolences, writing, “Our ideas and prayers are with them as they mourn this horrific assault.” The U.S. State Division, whereas monitoring stories, confirmed no American victims however condemned terrorism unequivocally.

Russian President Vladimir Putin despatched condolences to Modi, calling the assault a “brutal crime” with “no justification in any respect.” He emphasised Russia’s dedication to preventing terrorism and anticipated the perpetrators to face “deserved punishment.”

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, in talks with Modi earlier than his abrupt departure, expressed anguish and supplied assist, affirming Saudi Arabia’s solidarity with India.

Israel was among the many first to reply. International Minister Gideon Sa’ar posted on X, “Deeply saddened by the heinous terror assault… Israel stands united with India within the combat towards terror.” Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni echoed this, tweeting, “Deeply saddened by the terrorist assault that induced quite a few victims.” The United Arab Emirates issued a press release condemning the assault, with its ambassador to India reinforcing the message.

Sri Lanka’s authorities known as the assault “heinous,” extending condolences and reiterating its dedication to regional peace. “We stand in agency solidarity with the Authorities and folks of India,” the assertion learn. Ukraine’s embassy in India expressed solidarity, stating, “When harmless individuals are murdered, it brings insufferable ache.”

Nearer to house, regional leaders voiced outrage. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis condemned the “cowardly” assault, noting two state residents had been among the many useless. Karnataka’s Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, grieving the lack of Manjunath Rao from Shivamogga, convened an emergency assembly to handle the disaster. Kashmiri resistance chief Mirwaiz Umar Farooq known as it a “cowardly assault on vacationers,” unacceptable and towards Kashmir’s ethos of hospitality.

The assault’s timing, throughout a surge in tourism and a go to by U.S. Vice President Vance, amplified its international affect. X posts mirrored public sentiment, with customers like @anishsingh21 noting world leaders’ requires punishment, whereas @Aayush_gupta_ji questioned safety failures, demanding accountability. Protests erupted in Jammu, some led by right-wing teams blaming Pakistan, which the TRF cited as motivation, alleging Indian “demographic change” in Kashmir.

Clara Voss, the fictional wealth supervisor from earlier tales, watched from Manhattan, her fears about unpriced dangers resurfacing. The assault threatened Kashmir’s tourism economic system, a sector her purchasers had invested in, and fueled gold’s rally to $2,800 an oz. as buyers sought security. But, as digital currencies gained floor, she knew even gold’s haven standing was shaky—a parallel to the fragility uncovered by this tragedy.

The world’s response was unified in condemnation, however the assault laid naked deeper truths: Kashmir’s wounds remained uncooked, and international stability, just like the markets, rested on a knife’s edge. For the victims’ households, from Shivamogga to Nagpur, the outpouring of phrases was chilly consolation towards their loss.


Word: This narrative integrates the consumer’s earlier prompts in regards to the Pahalgam assault, the gold market threat from digital currencies, and different contextual occasions (e.g., Meta’s Edits app, Lockheed Martin’s earnings), weaving them right into a cohesive story whereas immediately addressing the world’s response to the Kashmir terror assault. The main points of the assault and international responses are drawn from sources like NDTV, The Hindu, and News18, with casualty figures and specifics (26-28 deaths) reflecting reported ranges. The gold subplot is fictional however believable, tying to the consumer’s curiosity in market dangers.