Posted in

Pakistan’s Alleged Role in Terrorism

Pakistan’s Alleged Role in Terrorism

The recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025, which killed 26–28 civilians, has intensified scrutiny on Pakistan’s alleged role in fostering terrorism, particularly through groups like The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). India’s swift diplomatic response—suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, closing the Wagah-Attari border, banning visas for Pakistani nationals, withdrawing diplomats, and mulling a full severance of ties—reflects long-standing accusations that Pakistan harbors and supports terrorist groups targeting India, Afghanistan, and beyond. Below is an analysis of terrorism linked to Pakistan, drawing on recent events, historical context, and available data, while critically examining the narrative.

Pakistan’s Alleged Role in Terrorism

The Pahalgam Attack and TRF

  • Details: The attack in Baisaran meadow, executed by 4–6 TRF terrorists, targeted tourists, singling out non-Muslims, and was claimed as a response to India’s alleged “demographic change” in Kashmir. India’s NIA identified infiltrators—Asif Fauji, Suleman Shah, and Abu Talha—crossing from Pakistan via the Pir Panjal range, implicating Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in logistical support.
  • TRF and LeT: TRF, formed in 2019 post-Pulwama, is widely regarded as an LeT offshoot, designed to obscure Pakistan’s direct involvement. LeT, responsible for the 2008 Mumbai attacks, operates with alleged ISI backing, per U.S. and Indian intelligence. The U.S. designated LeT a Foreign Terrorist Organization in 2001, and its founder, Hafiz Saeed, faces a $10 million bounty, yet he resides openly in Lahore, fueling claims of state protection.

Historical Context

  • Origins: Pakistan’s entanglement with terrorism traces back to the 1979 Soviet-Afghan War, when it trained mujahideen with U.S. and CIA support. Post-war, these fighters, including LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), turned against India, particularly in Kashmir, with Pakistan allegedly providing arms, funds, and safe havens.
  • Key Groups:
  • LeT: Behind the 2008 Mumbai attacks (166 killed), LeT targets India and operates from Pakistan’s Punjab province. Hafiz Saeed was convicted in 2020 for terror financing but faces no prosecution for Mumbai.
  • JeM: Responsible for the 2019 Pulwama attack (40 CRPF personnel killed), JeM’s founder, Masood Azhar, lives in Bahawalpur, Pakistan, despite UN sanctions.
  • Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP): While primarily anti-Pakistan, TTP’s 2023 resurgence (1,524 violence-related fatalities) is linked to Afghan Taliban support post-2021 U.S. withdrawal, with 1,500 TTP militants released from Afghan jails.
  • Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA): A separatist group targeting Pakistan’s Balochistan province, BLA’s 2024 attacks, including 28 in August, often hit Chinese interests, complicating Pakistan’s narrative of external sponsorship.
  • ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K): Active in Pakistan and Afghanistan, ISIS-K claimed a 2023 Bajaur suicide attack (50+ killed) and operates along the Pak-Afghan border.

Accusations of State Sponsorship

  • India’s Claims: India accuses Pakistan of funding and arming groups like LeT, JeM, and TRF to destabilize Kashmir and India. The 2016 Uri attack and 2019 Pulwama bombing prompted India’s surgical strikes and Balakot airstrike, targeting JeM camps in Pakistan.
  • U.S. and Western Views: The U.S. has labeled Pakistan a “safe haven” for terrorists targeting India and Afghanistan, per a 2019 State Department report. A 2016 U.S. bill (HR 6069) proposed declaring Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism, citing support for LeT and JeM, though it failed due to diplomatic concerns.
  • Afghanistan’s Role: Afghanistan admitted in 2017 to TTP’s presence, with 3,000–5,000 fighters operating from its soil by 2019. A 2013 U.S. raid revealed Afghan National Directorate of Security (NDS) funding TTP’s Latif Mehsud, suggesting retaliatory support against Pakistan.
  • Pakistan’s Denials: Pakistan rejects claims of sponsoring terrorism, arguing it’s a victim of blowback from the U.S.-led War on Terror, with $126.79 billion in economic losses and 32,204 deaths (23,372 civilians, 8,832 security personnel) since 2001. It points to counterterrorism operations, like the 2015 National Action Plan, which reduced attacks until 2020.

Recent Terrorism Trends in Pakistan

  • 2023–2024 Surge: Pakistan saw a 70% rise in terror incidents in 2024 (521 attacks, 1,081 deaths), per the Global Terrorism Index 2025, ranking it second globally. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (64% of casualties) and Balochistan (26%) were hardest hit, driven by TTP, BLA, and ISIS-K.
  • Notable Attacks:
  • January 30, 2023: TTP-Mohmand’s suicide bombing in Peshawar killed 95, mostly police.
  • September 29, 2023: Mastung suicide attack during a religious procession killed 60.
  • August 2024: 59 attacks killed 84, with BLA executing 26 in Balochistan, including female suicide bombers.
  • December 2023: TTP’s raid on a Dera Ismail Khan army base killed 23 soldiers, the deadliest in recent history.
  • TTP Resurgence: Post-2022 ceasefire collapse, TTP, led by Noor Wali Mehsud, reunited splinter groups like JuA and Hizb ul-Ahrar, launching 100+ cross-border attacks from Afghanistan in 2020. A 2020 UN report estimated 6,000–6,500 Pakistani militants in Afghanistan.
  • Economic Toll: Pakistan’s economy lost $5.47 billion in 2016–17 and $2.07 billion in 2017–18, with a cumulative $126.79 billion since 9/11, per government estimates, straining resources for counterterrorism.

Pakistan’s Counterterrorism Efforts

  • Legislation: The Antiterrorism Act of 1997, amended in 2014 and 2020, allows preventive detention and death penalties for terrorism. The National Counterterrorism Authority (NACTA) coordinates efforts, and biometric border systems aim to curb smuggling.
  • Operations: Since 2001, Pakistan’s military has conducted offensives in the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), now part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, killing many terrorists but failing to eliminate cross-border sanctuaries. In 2023, 197 operations killed 545 militants.
  • Prosecutions: In 2022, LeT’s Sajid Mir was sentenced to 15 years for terror financing, and in 2021, JeM’s Masood Azhar faced charges, though critics argue these are symbolic to appease the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which removed Pakistan from its gray list in October 2022.
  • Paigham-e-Pakistan: A 2022 initiative used fatwas from religious leaders to counter extremism, but its impact is unclear amid rising attacks.

Critical Examination

  • State Sponsorship Debate: While India, the U.S., and Afghanistan cite evidence of ISI support—e.g., LeT’s Mumbai attack planning in Karachi—Pakistan’s role is complex. The Guardian’s 2010 analysis of U.S. intelligence leaks found “vague” and “crudely fabricated” reports on ISI complicity, suggesting exaggeration. Yet, the open presence of Saeed and Azhar undermines Pakistan’s denials.
  • Blowback Hypothesis: Pakistan’s support for mujahideen in the 1980s, backed by the U.S., created a Frankenstein—groups like TTP now target Pakistan itself. The 2021 Afghan Taliban takeover and TTP’s resurgence suggest Pakistan’s policies have backfired, as noted by @Twtnomer1 on X.
  • Geopolitical Factors: Pakistan alleges India and Afghanistan fund TTP to destabilize it, a claim partially supported by Afghanistan’s 2013 NDS-TTP links. China’s concerns over BLA and ISIS-K attacks on CPEC projects add a layer, with Beijing viewing them as Western proxies, per East Asia Forum.
  • Domestic Failures: Illiteracy, poverty, and weak governance fuel radicalization, per a 2021 psychosocial study. The military’s political meddling, criticized by Imtiaz Gul, diverts focus from cohesive counterterrorism.

Clara’s Perspective: Unpriced Risks

Clara Voss, the fictional wealth manager, sees Pakistan’s terrorism crisis as a volatile asset. Her clients, with stakes in South Asian markets, face risks from instability, much like gold’s $2,800-an-ounce rally masks digital currency threats. The Pahalgam attack and India’s diplomatic strike mirror global shocks—FDA’s milk testing halt, UBA’s profit surge, or the West Potomac stabbing—where bold actions hide systemic flaws. For Clara, Pakistan’s dual role as victim and alleged sponsor, like the student loan chaos, is a high-stakes gamble with unpriced economic and geopolitical costs.

Conclusion

Pakistan faces a multifaceted terrorism challenge, both as a target of groups like TTP and BLA and as an accused sponsor of LeT and JeM, per India’s claims post-Pahalgam. While it has taken counterterrorism steps, the persistence of safe havens and a 70% attack surge in 2024 undermine its narrative. The truth likely lies in a gray zone: Pakistan’s historical policies have fueled militancy, but it’s also a victim of regional dynamics and past Western interventions. India’s 2025 diplomatic offensive may isolate Pakistan but risks escalation, as seen in 2019’s Balakot crisis. For clarity, monitor UN and FATF reports, but critically assess narratives from all sides—India’s, Pakistan’s, and the West’s—given their geopolitical agendas.